Voris M. Tejada, Jr., Esq., Author at Full Service Law Firm in Mt. Laurel Township, NJ

Aug 4

Voris M. Tejada, Jr., Esq.

Pennsylvania Superior Court Interprets “Absolute Auto Exclusion” Against Insurer Due to Ambiguity

In Chris Eldredge Containers, LLC v. Crum & Foster Specialty Insurance Company, et al.,...

May 8

Voris M. Tejada, Jr., Esq.

Defending Property Damage Claims Under the Continuous or Repeated Leakage Exclusion

Many homeowners’ insurance policies contain an exclusion for “continuous or repeated leakage or seepage...

Jul 18

Voris M. Tejada, Jr., Esq.

The Enforcement and Application of Shortened Limitations Period Clauses in Insurance Policies

In the State of New Jersey, breach of contract claims are subject to a...

Jan 31

Voris M. Tejada, Jr., Esq.

Pennsylvania’s Ongoing Snow Storm Precedent is Applied to Snow and Ice Falling from Rooftops

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently reaffirmed the scope of the duty owed by...

Oct 28

Voris M. Tejada, Jr., Esq.

Supreme Court of New Jersey Holds the Products Liability Act Does Not Bar a Consumer Fraud Act Claim Alleging Express Misrepresentations

The Supreme Court of New Jersey recently considered “whether a Consumer Fraud Act (“CFA”)...

Jun 19

Voris M. Tejada, Jr., Esq.

Divided Supreme Court Finds Employers May Pursue Subrogation for Workers’ Compensation Benefits Paid for Economic Loss Where Employee Did Not Seek or Receive PIP Benefits

On May 12, 2020, the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed whether an employer...

Oct 9

Voris M. Tejada, Jr., Esq.

Court Not Required to Charge Comparative Negligence Where No Evidence that Subcontractor’s Employee Acted Unreasonably

Plaintiff, the employee of a subcontractor, sued the general contractor for negligence after he...

Celebrating 150 Years of Service and Trust to Our Clients

Pennsylvania Superior Court Interprets “Absolute Auto Exclusion” Against Insurer Due to Ambiguity

Defending Property Damage Claims Under the Continuous or Repeated Leakage Exclusion

The Enforcement and Application of Shortened Limitations Period Clauses in Insurance Policies

Pennsylvania’s Ongoing Snow Storm Precedent is Applied to Snow and Ice Falling from Rooftops

Supreme Court of New Jersey Holds the Products Liability Act Does Not Bar a Consumer Fraud Act Claim Alleging Express Misrepresentations

Divided Supreme Court Finds Employers May Pursue Subrogation for Workers’ Compensation Benefits Paid for Economic Loss Where Employee Did Not Seek or Receive PIP Benefits

Court Not Required to Charge Comparative Negligence Where No Evidence that Subcontractor’s Employee Acted Unreasonably

Capehart Process

Schedule A Consult

Get To Know Capehart

Join Our Team

About

Practice Areas

Contact