The New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Commission (“NJ-CRC”) recently released much anticipated workplace guidance for how employers can and should handle workplace impairment.
The guidance released by the NJ-CRC applies to all employers, whether operating in the cannabis industry or otherwise. The guidance first and foremost reiterates that an employee cannot be subject to any adverse employment actions due to a positive drug test for cannabis alone under New Jersey law. For an employer to take an adverse employment action against an employee, a positive drug test AND “evidence based documentation” that the employee is impaired during working hours is needed.
The long anticipated guidance does not create the scheme for certifying workplace impairment recognition experts as many had hoped. However, it does note that employers can still use reasonable suspicion testing with “evidence based documentation” in order to show an employee is intoxicated on the job and ultimately to take adverse actions against an employee.
The question becomes, what is “evidence based documentation” that an employee is impaired, and who can provide it? The NJ-CRC notes that, employers can use “established protocols” for developing reasonable suspicion that an employee is impaired on the job. This means that employers can designate an interim staff member or third-party contractor to help determine that an employee may be impaired on the job. The interim staff member or third-party contractor would also be responsible for filling out the appropriate documentation.
Signs of employee impairment that can be documented include behavioral indicators such as slurred speech or impaired judgment, physical manifestations which include flushed skin or bloodshot eyes, or other evidence such as odor or diminished performance. The NJ-CRC drafted a sample form that can be used to document impairment which can be found here.
Additionally, if an employer chooses, they can use a cognitive impairment test or eye scans to help determine if an employee is impaired on the job. Once documentation showing reasonable suspicion an employee is impaired on the job is combined with a positive drug screen, an employer can take adverse employment actions against an employee – including firing.
Therefore, the guidance recommends that employers first establish and document reasonable suspicion that an employee is impaired on the job and then drug test the employee to verify that the employee has used the intoxicating substance.
Overall, this guidance, while offering broad protections for employee off-the-clock cannabis usage, empowers employers to fire employees they believe show signs of impairment on the clock. It further gives employers a wide range of tools to document said impairment.
These protections do not apply to everyone, however. If an employer has federal contracts, it still may take adverse employment actions against an employee based on a positive drug test alone.
If you have any questions about this new guidance, please contact a member of the firm’s Cannabis Law Group.
Ready, Set Go!