Full Service Law Firm in Mt. Laurel Township, NJ | Capehart Scatchard

Legislature Revises Requirements for Use of Restraints on Disabled Students

January 18, 2018
By Sanmathi (Sanu) Dev, Esq.

Educational facilities, including public school districts, may use physical restraints to support students with disabilities experiencing significant behavioral difficulties. Such interventions must be implemented by trained personnel. On January 8, 2018, the New Jersey Legislature approved Senate Bill 1163, which updated the requirements for use of restraints on students with disabilities in school districts, educational services commissions, and approved private schools for students with disabilities.

As a threshold matter, physical restraint is defined as the “use of a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move all or a portion of his or her body.” Under the new requirements, restraints must only be used in emergency situations in which the student’s behavior places the student or others in immediate physical danger. Restraints must be used minimally – school districts should avoid the use of physical restraints by implementing other interventions to address a student’s behavior, such positive behavior support plans.

If a physical restraint must be used, only individuals who have received training from an entity determined by the board of education to be qualified to provide such training can implement a restraint on a student. Training to staff must be annually. These staff members must also implement restraints in accordance with the board of education’s policy.

Once a restraint is used, the school district must immediately notify the parents/legal guardians of the student and provide a written report to them within 48 hours. Further, written documentation of the incident prompting the use of the physical restraint must be maintained in order to assist the student’s educational team in determining appropriate programming and supports for the student.

Senate Bill 1163 also modifies requirements regarding seclusion, which is the “involuntary confinement of a student alone in a room or area from which the student is physically prevented from leaving, but does not include a timeout.”

Boards of education should review their policies regarding physical restraints and seclusion techniques in consultation with their board attorney to ensure they are consistent with the new requirements.

 

About the Author:

Sanmathi (Sanu) Dev

Chair, Education Practice


Ms. Dev concentrates her practice on the representation of boards of education and school districts in all areas of education law including: labor and employment, special education, Section 504, student discipline, student records, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act, School Ethics Act, student residency, civil rights, tenure, negotiations, Open Public Records Act, and Open Public Meetings Act.

In connection with these representations, she is an experienced litigator before State and Federal courts, including the Office of Administrative Law. She routinely defends school districts and employers in a variety of claims involving employee discipline and termination, discrimination, harassment, hostile work environment, leaves of absence, Family and Medical Leave Act, New Jersey Family Leave Act, health and safety, whistleblowing, Americans with Disabilities Act, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and First Amendment. Ms. Dev is also an experienced special education litigator and defends school districts in due process hearings from inception through trial. In addition, she litigates employment, labor, and civil rights claims before governmental agencies, including the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Office for Civil Rights, New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission, and New Jersey Division on Civil Rights.

Ms. Dev also serves as labor counsel and chief negotiator on behalf of employers. She negotiates collective bargaining agreements with union leadership and manages contract negotiations with various collective bargaining units. Ms. Dev defends grievances, disputes, and arbitrations related to collective bargaining agreements.

Ms. Dev founded Capehart Scatchard’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee and served as its Chair from 2017 through February 2024. From 2018-2023, she served as the firm’s Hiring Shareholder. Ms. Dev previously served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Ronald E. Bookbinder, A.J.S.C. in Burlington County.

Share

Top 30 Education Law Blogs

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Capehart Blogs

Categories