Full Service Law Firm in Mt. Laurel Township, NJ | Capehart Scatchard

Settlement Agreements of IDEA Cases in the OAL Are Disclosable Under OPRA

May 20, 2022
By Sanmathi (Sanu) Dev, Esq.

By: Angela Reading, Law Clerk

Editor: Sanmathi (Sanu) Dev, Esq.

On May 18, 2022, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued a published decision in the case of C.E. v. Elizabeth Public School District, in which the Court held that settlement agreements resolving Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) disputes that have been docketed in the Office of Administrative Law (“OAL”) and final decisions incorporating or pertaining to those settlement agreements are subject to disclosure under New Jersey’s Open Public Records Act (“OPRA”).  

Prior to this decision, boards of education typically deemed all special education settlement agreements as confidential student records exempt from disclosure under OPRA. In fact, on July 17, 2019, the New Jersey Supreme Court in L.R. v. Camden City Public School District held that settlement agreements with parents of special education students are not subject to release, absent a court order, even if that document has been stripped of personally identifiable information.  

In this decision, the Appellate Division distinguished L.R. and held it did not apply because the L.R. case did not involve settlements before the OAL, and the IDEA was not at issue. Instead, the Appellate Division determined that IDEA regulations governed.

The Appellate Division held that despite special education agreements being student records, when defendants, such as a public school district, settle matters involving IDEA claims in the OAL, these documents become judicial filings and are subject to a “presumption” of public access. The court explained that N.J.A.C. 6A:14-2.7 designates the OAL to hear special education complaints under the IDEA. Those settlement decisions are then incorporated into a final decision approving the settlement. Thus, under federal IDEA law, 34 C.F.R. § 300.513(d)(2), these decisions, which are judicial filings, must be available to the public after removing any student-identifying information. 

In practice, this precedential Appellate Division decision establishes that to comply with OPRA, a board of education must redact a student’s personally identifiable information before disclosing a special education settlement agreement incorporated into a decision at the OAL. However, agreements resolving special education disputes before the matter is transmitted to OAL, such as mediation agreements or resolution agreements, remain student records exempt from OPRA disclosures under the holding in L.R. v. Camden City Public School District.  

About the Author:

Sanmathi (Sanu) Dev

Chair, Education Practice


Ms. Dev concentrates her practice on the representation of boards of education and school districts in all areas of education law including: labor and employment, special education, Section 504, student discipline, student records, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act, School Ethics Act, student residency, civil rights, tenure, negotiations, Open Public Records Act, and Open Public Meetings Act.

In connection with these representations, she is an experienced litigator before State and Federal courts, including the Office of Administrative Law. She routinely defends school districts and employers in a variety of claims involving employee discipline and termination, discrimination, harassment, hostile work environment, leaves of absence, Family and Medical Leave Act, New Jersey Family Leave Act, health and safety, whistleblowing, Americans with Disabilities Act, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and First Amendment. Ms. Dev is also an experienced special education litigator and defends school districts in due process hearings from inception through trial. In addition, she litigates employment, labor, and civil rights claims before governmental agencies, including the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Office for Civil Rights, New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission, and New Jersey Division on Civil Rights.

Ms. Dev also serves as labor counsel and chief negotiator on behalf of employers. She negotiates collective bargaining agreements with union leadership and manages contract negotiations with various collective bargaining units. Ms. Dev defends grievances, disputes, and arbitrations related to collective bargaining agreements.

Ms. Dev founded Capehart Scatchard’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee and served as its Chair from 2017 through February 2024. From 2018-2023, she served as the firm’s Hiring Shareholder. Ms. Dev previously served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Ronald E. Bookbinder, A.J.S.C. in Burlington County.

Share

Top 30 Education Law Blogs

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Capehart Blogs

Categories